Joule, Mayer, and Others: A Decade-and-a-Half-Long Debate over Priority in the Discovery of the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
1113


Downloads
37
UDC
Издательство
Date of publication
14.12.2021
Public year
2021
DOI
10.31857/S020596060017503-5
Joule, Mayer, and Others: A Decade-and-a-Half-Long Debate over Priority in the Discovery of the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?

This article reviews the history of a debate over priority in the discovery of the mechanical equivalent of heat that was centered around J. P. Joule and J. R. von Mayer. The following two stages may be distinguished in this debate. During the first stage, those involved in it were Joule and Mayer themselves. While Mayer presented a numerical value for the mechanical equivalent of heat, which was based on the data from Gay-Lussac’s experiment, Joule determined the value of this coefficient in his own experiment although he did it later than Mayer (actually, Joule was unaware of Gay-Lussac’s experiment). This article shows that, in the end, Joule and William Thomson, who also participated in the debate, recognized (even though formally and with reservations) Mayer’s priority.

During the second stage of the debate, its participants were British scientists who supported Mayer or Joule. Thus, Mayer’s priority was supported by Professor J. Tyndall of the Royal Institution in London and it was he who initiated the resumption of the discussion. Joule’s priority was advocated by Professor W. Thomson of the University of Glasgow and Professor P. Tait of the University of Edinburgh. It is noted that a personal animosity between Tyndall and Tait, as well as Tyndall’s competitive attitude towards Thomson, had a significant impact on the tone of the debate, and the examples of Tait’s provocative remarks and Tyndall’s reactions are provided. Joule’s involvement during the second stage of the debate that was mostly limited to private correspondence between himself, Tait, Thomson, and Tyndall, is discussed. Over the time elapsed after the first stage of the debate, the level of rejection of Mayer’s arguments by the scientific community had decreased significantly.

The awarding of the Royal Society’s Copley Medal to Joule (1870) and Mayer (1871), both of them nominated by Tyndall, came as a symbolic conclusion of the debate.

Об авторах
Boris Bulyubash
Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R. E. Alekseev
References

1. Cahan, D. (2012) The Awarding of the Copley Medal and the ‘Discovery’ of the Law of Conservation of Energy: Joule, Mayer and Helmholtz Revisited, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 125–139.

2. Cardwell, D. (1989) James Joule: A Biography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

3. Collins, M. W. (2015) The First Law of Thermodynamics: The Joule – Mayer Controversy, WIT Transactions on State-of-the-art in Science and Engineering, vol. 89.

4. Diugem, P. (Duhem, P.) (1910) Fizicheskaia teoriia, ee tsel’ i stroenie [The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory]. Sankt-Peterburg: Obrazovanie.

5. Fox, R. M. (1969) James Prescott Joule, in: North, J. (ed.) Mid-Nineteenth-Century Scientists: The Commonwealth and International Library. Liberal Studies Division. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 72–103.

6. Frankfurt, U. I. (1978) Zakon sokhraneniia i prevrashcheniia energii [The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy]. Moskva: Nauka.

7. Gay-Lussac, J. L. (1807) Premier essai pour déterminer les variations de température qu’éprouvent les gaz en changeant de densité, et considérations sur leur capacité pour le calorique, Mémoires de physique et de chimie de la Société d’Arcueil, vol. 1, pp. 180–203.

8. Gel’mgol’ts, G. (Helmholtz, H.) (1934) O sokhranenii sily. 2-e izd. [On the Conservation of Force. 2nd ed.]. Moskva and Leningrad: Gostekhteorizdat.

9. Helmholtz, H. (1847) Über die Erhaltung der Kraft. Berlin: G. Reimer.

10. Joule, J. (1843) On the Caloric Effects of Magneto-Electricity, and on the Mechanical Value of Heat, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, vol. 23, no. 152, pp. 263–276.

11. Joule, J. (1843) On the Caloric Effects of Magneto-Electricity, and on the Mechanical Value of Heat. Part II. On the Mechanical Value of Heat, The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 3rd Series, vol. 23, no. 154, pp. 435–443.

12. Joule, J. (1849) Sur l’équivalent mécanique de calorique, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences, vol. 28, pp. 132–135.

13. Joule, J. (1850) On the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 140, pt. 1, pp. 61–82.

14. Joule, J. (1863) On the Dynamical Theory of Heat, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 26, no. 173, pp. 145–147.

15. Joule, J. P. (1847) Expériences sur l’identité entre le calorique et la force méchanique. Détermination de l’équivalent par la chaleur dégagée pendant la friction du mercure, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences, vol. 25, pp. 309–311.

16. Kudriavtsev, P. S. (1956) Istoriia fiziki [A History of Physics]. Moskva: Uchpedgiz, vol. 2.

17. Lloyd, J. T. (1970) Background to the Joule – Mayer Controversy, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 211–225.

18. Mayer, J. R. (1862) Remarks on the Forces of Inorganic Nature, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 24, no. 162, pp. 371–377.

19. Mayer, J. R. (1863) Remarks on the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 25, no. 171, pp. 493–522.

20. Mayer, J.-R. (1849) Réclamation de priorité contre M. Joule, relativement à la loi de l’équivalence du calorique, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences, vol. 29, p. 534.

21. Mayer, R. (1842) Bemerkungen über die Kräfte der unbelebten Nature, Annalen der Chemie und Pharmazie, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 233–240.

22. Mayer, R. (1845) Die organische Bewegung in ihrem Zusammenhange mit dem Stoffwechsel. Heilbronn: Drechsler.

23. Mayer, R. (1848) Beiträge zur Dynamik des Himmels in populärer Darstellung. Heilbronn: J. U. Landherr.

24. Plank, M. (Planck, M.) (1938) Printsip sokhraneniia energii [The Principle of Conservation of Energy]. Moskva and Leningrad: GONTI, Redaktsiia tekhniko-teoreticheskoi literatury.

25. Rosenfeld, L. (1952) Joule’s Scientific Outlook, Bulletin of the British Society for the History of Science, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 169–176.

26. Rozenberger, F. (1936) Istoriia fiziki [A History of Physics]. Moskva and Leningrad: Ob”edinennoe nauchno-tekhnicheskoe izdatel’stvo NKTP SSSR, pt. 3, no. 2.

27. Shcherbakov, R. (2016) Rytsari velikogo zakona [The Knights of the Great Law], Priroda, no. 2, pp. 68–76.

28. Sivukhin, D. V. (1990) Obshchii kurs fiziki [A General Course of Physics]. Moskva: Nauka, vol. 2: Termodinamika i molekuliarnaia fizika [Thermodynamics and Molecular Physics].Sur la transformation de la force vive en chaleur, et réciproquement (extrait d’une lettre de M. Mayer) (1848), Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences, vol. 27, pp. 385–387.

29. Tait, P. G. (1863) On the Conservation of Energy, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 25, no. 170, pp. 429–431.

30. Tait, P. G. (1863) Reply to Prof. Tyndall’s Remarks on a Paper on “Energy” in ‛Good Words’, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 25, no. 168, pp. 263–266.

31. Thomson, W. (1853) On the Dynamical Theory of Heat, with Numerical Results Deduced from Mr Joule’s Equivalent of a Thermal Unit, and Mr Regnault’s Observations on Steam, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. 20, pt. 2, pp. 261–288.

32. Thomson, W. (1863) Note on Professor Tyndall’s “Remarks on the Dynamical Theory of Heat”, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 25, no. 170, p. 429.

33. Thomson, W., Tait, P. G. (1862) Energy, Good Words, pp. 601–607.

34. Tindall’, Dzh. (Tyndall, J.) (1864) Teplota, rassmatrivaemaia kak rod dvizheniia [Heat Considered as a Mode of Motion]. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel’stvo khar’kovskogo knizhnogo magazina E. S. Ballinoi.

35. Turner, R. (1974) Julius Robert Mayer, in: Gillispie, Ch. (ed.) Dictionary of Scientific Biography. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, vol. 9, p. 237.

36. Tyndall, J. (1862) On Force, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 24, no. 158, pp. 57–66.

37. Tyndall, J. (1863) Remarks on an Article Entitled “Energy” in ‛Good Words’, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 25, no. 167, pp. 220–224.

38. Tyndall, J. (1863) Remarks on Professor Tait’s Last Letter to Sir David Brewster, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 26, no. 172, pp. 65–67.

39. Tyndall, J. (1863) Remarks on the Dynamical Theory of Heat, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4th Series, vol. 25, no. 169, pp. 368–387.