The article examines the problems associated with the nonequivalence provided by various financial instruments of collateral, which are used by banks in the implementation of credit policies. The authors prove that the principle of equivalence of financial security is violated in the banking sector as a consequence of the implementation of targeted policies promoting the use of certain instruments by banks and due to inadequate assessment of risks associated with the use of an instrument in real practice. There is a comparative analysis of such financial instruments as the «pledge of the bank''s own promissory note» and «security deposit». The authors propose to include in the list of acceptable instruments of collateral in terms of CBR Regulation № 254-P guarantee from individuals meeting the relevant requirements. They also introduced proposals to change the content of the credit agreement linked to security in the form of a pledge of bank''s own notes and security deposit.