The Embassy of Pyotr Potemkin to Spain, 1667–1668: Some Features of Mutual Perception and Dialogue of Two Diplomacies
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Date of publication
Public year
The Embassy of Pyotr Potemkin to Spain, 1667–1668: Some Features of Mutual Perception and Dialogue of Two Diplomacies
Читать книгу
О чем книга?

The Russian diplomacy of the 17th century had some specific features in comparison with the Western European diplomacy of the same time. The purpose of this article is to identify these features and analyze the perception of Russian ambassadors by European diplomats. The research is based on both Russian and Spanish documentation of the embassy of Piotr Potemkin (1667–1668), the first Russian embassy in Spain. Since there were no instances of diplomatic contacts between the two countries in the past, the diplomatic ceremonial was of crucial importance for P. Potemkin’s mission. Since no contact between the diplomats and the Ambassadorial Chancellery in Moscow was not possible due to the long distance between Russia and Spain, the detailed instructions (nakaz) given to P. Potemkin in Moscow acquired a special significance. Therefore the article aims to determine the extent and nature of the dependence of the diplomats’ actions on their instructions. A comparative analysis of the nakaz and the final report (stateinyi spisok) in the part related to the stay of the embassy in Madrid and the negotiation process shows that the ambassadors scrupulously observed the nakaz, taking initiative only in those cases that were not covered by it. All of its requirements had a logical explanation: not to harm the interests of Russia, not to lower the honour of the envoys of a great power, not to create a bad precedent in the diplomatic ceremonial. The Spanish side, not sufficiently aware of the specifics of the nakaz, sometimes did not understand the behaviour of the ambassadors, attributing it to their vanity, pettiness, and bad temper. At the same time, although the Russian embassy took Spanish diplomats wholly by surprise, the latter managed, within a limited time, to collect a variety of information about the Russians and take it into account, showing flexibility in organizing audiences and during negotiations. Although there were differences between Spanish and Russian diplomats, both sides adhered to European diplomatic practice. The absence of contradictions between the two states and their interest in establishing diplomatic relations and developing bilateral trade determined the success of P. Potemkin’s embassy.

Об авторах
Vladimir Védyushkin
Senior Research Fellow of the Institute of World History

1. Alekseev M.P. Moskovskii pod'iachii Ia. Polushkin i italo-ispanskii gumanist Pedro Martir [Moscow clerk Ya. Polushkin and Italian-Spanish humanist Pedro Martir] // Sravnitel'noe literaturovedenie [Comparative literature studies]. Moskva, 1983. P. 49–57. (In Russ.)

2. Egea Fernández M.A. Priiom russkogo posol'stva 1667–1668 gg. pri dvore Karla II (po materialam ispanskikh arkhivov) [Reception of the Russian Embassy 1667–1668 at the court of Charles II (based on the documents from Spanish archives)] // Rus', Rossiia: Srednevekov'e i Novoe vremia [Rus, Russia: Middle Ages and Modern Age]. Vyp. 4 Moskva, 2015. P. 205–209. (In Russ.)

3. Egea Fernández M.A. Pervoe russkoe posol'stvo v Ispanskoe korolevstvo (1667–1668 gody). Istochniki ispanskikh arkhivov [First Russian embassy to the Kingdom of Spain (1667–1668). Sources from Spanish archives] // Novaia i noveishaia istoriia [Modern and contemporary history]. 2016. № 4. P. 115–125. (In Russ.)

4. Falkón Ramírez J. Russkoe posol'stvo 1681 goda: popytka razvitiia dvustoronnei torgovli [Russian Embassy of 1681: an attempt to develop bilateral trade] // Problemy ispanskoi istorii. 1992 [Problems of Spanish history. 1992]. Moskva, 1992. P. 104–111. (In Russ.)

5. Fernández Izquierdo F. Pervye ispano-russkie diplomaticheskie kontakty: posol'stvo P.I. Potemkina v 1667–1668 godakh [The first Spanish-Russian diplomatic contacts: the embassy of P.I. Potemkin in 1667–1668] // Problemy ispanskoi istorii. 1992 [Problems of Spanish history. 1992]. Moskva, 1992. P. 95–104. (In Russ.)

6. Floria B.N. Vneshnepoliticheskaia programma A.L. Ordina-Nashchokina i popytki ee osushchestvleniia [The foreign policy program of A.L. Ordin-Nashchokin and attempts to realize it]. Moskva, 2013. (In Russ.)

7. Karaulova M.K. Iakov Fedorovich Dolgorukov (1687–1688) [Iakov Fedorovich Dolgorukov (1687–1688)] // Rossiiskie diplomaty v Ispanii. 1667–2017. Diplomáticos rusos en España. 1667–2017 / otv. red. O.V. Volosiuk [Russian diplomats in Spain. 1667–2017. Diplomáticos rusos en España. 1667–2017 / ed. O.V. Volosiuk]. Moskva, 2016. P. 13–22. (In Russ.)

8. Kazakova N.A. A.A. Vinius i stateinyi spisok ego posol'stva v Angliiu, Frantsiiu i Ispaniiu [A.A. Vinius and stateinyi spisok of his embassy to England, France and Spain] // Trudy otdela drevnerusskoi literatury [Works of the Department of Ancient Russian Literature]. T. 39. Leningrad, 1985. P. 348–364. (In Russ.)

9. Posol'stvo P.I. Potemkina v Ispaniiu v 1667–1668 godakh: dokumenty i materialy / otv. red. V.A. Vediushkin, sost. V.A. Vediushkin, E.E. Rychalovskii [Embassy of P.I. Potemkin in Spain in 1667–1668: Documents and Studies / ed. V.A. Vediushkin, compiled by V.A. Vediushkin, E.E. Rychalovsky]. Moskva, 2018. (In Russ.)

10. Rychalovskii E.E. Piotr Ivanovich Potiomkin na gosudarevoi sluzhbe [Piotr Ivanovich Potiomkin in the sovereign’s service] // Ispaniia i Rossiia: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennaia epokha / otv. red. O.V. Volosiuk [Spain and Russia: historical destinies and the present time / ed. O.V. Volosiuk]. Moskva, 2017. P. 107–114. (In Russ.)

11. Stateinyi spisok P.I. Potiomkina (Frantsiia) [Stateinyi spisok of P.I. Potiomkin (France )] // Puteshestviia russkikh poslov XVI−XVII vv.: Stateinye spiski [Travels of Russian ambassadors of the 16th −17th centuries: Stateinye spiski]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008. P. 227–315, 426–441. (In Russ.)

12. Tret'iakova M.V. “Takoi chishchenoi gramoty nam ne imyvat'”, ili K voprosu o posol'stve stol'nika P.I. Potemkina i d'iaka S. Rumiantseva vo Frantsiiu v 1667–1668 godakh [“We’ll not take such a scrubbed charter”, or to the question of the embassy of the stolnik P.I. Potemkin and diak S. Rumyantsev to France in 1667–1668] // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia “Istoriia” [Bulletin of Tver State University. Series “History”]. 2013. Vyp. 1 P. 43–62. (In Russ.)

13. Vediushkin V.A. Kogda v Rossii uznali o smerti korolia Ispanii Filippa IV? Ob odnom kazuse iz istorii russko-ispanskikh otnoshenii [When did they know in Russia about the death of King Philip IV of Spain? About one casus from the history of Russian-Spanish relations] // Elektronnyi nauchno-obrazovatel'nyi zhurnal “Istoriia”. 2016. Vyp. 8 (52) [Electronic scientific and educational journal “History”. 2016. Issue 8 (52). URL: (access date: 28.04.2021). (In Russ.)

14. Volosiuk O.V. Vneshniaia politika Ispanii v XVIII veke: stanovlenie russko-ispanskikh otnoshenii [Spanish foreign policy in the 18th century: the formation of Russian-Spanish relations]. Moskva, 2011. (In Russ.)

15. Derjavin C. La primera embajada rusa en España // Boletín de la Real Academia de la Historia. 1930. № 96. P. 891–896.

16. Egea Fernández M.A. La primera embajada moscovita a la Monarquía Hispánica. // From Ireland to Poland: Northern Europe, Spain and the Early Modern World / eds E. García Hernán, R. Skowron.Valencia, 2015. P. 273–288.

17. Fernández Izquierdo F. Las embajadas rusas a la Corte de Carlos II // Studia Historica. Historia Moderna. 2000. Vol. 22. P. 75–107.

18. Hennings J. Russia and Courtly Europe: Ritual and the Culture of Diplomacy, 1648–1725. Cambridge, 2016.

19. López de Méneses A. Las primeras embajadas rusas en España (1523, 1525 y 1527) // Bulletin Hispanique. 1946. T. 48. № 3. P. 210–226.

20. Schaub M.K. Avoir l’oreille du Roi. L’Ambassade de Pierre Potemkin et Siméon Roumiantsev en France en 1668 // Paroles de Négociateurs. L’Entretien dans la pratique diplomatique de la fin du Moyen Âge à la fin du XIXe siècle / Andretta S. et alii. Rome, 2010. P. 213–229.