The article shows the significance of the Paris Climate Conference, different attitudes to its decisions of the U. S. President D. Trump, his administration, the Republican and Democratic parties supporters, as well as of American fuel and energy complex corporations and those companies that profess the green exchange rate. Various instruments for the development of renewable energy sources (RES) are considered. Data for the harmful effects of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment and human health are presented. The problem of climate change is one of the points of inter-party disagreements that are broadcasted to great masses of population. According to a poll conducted by the Pew Research Center in Washington, Democrats, along with moderate and liberal Republicans, support the fight against global warming, while conservative Republicans, due to close ties with energy-intensive industries, are in the position of climate skepticism. The analysis of renewable energy advantages and disadvantages is given. To demonstrate its limited possibilities, the author points out that green technologies can only work together with a fossil fuels system, since any electric system operating from wind or solar energy needs repair first; secondly, gas and coal thermal power plants are able to generate capacity in the amount and at a time when the market needs it, while the solar and wind stations work intermittently when the wind is blowing and the sun is shining. Although these disadvantages are recognized as fair, nonetheless, RES have unquestionable advantages over hydrocarbons. What is particularly important is the easy accessibility of the huge potential of solar energy (especially in the southern states), which is considered the second opportunity after the nuclear power to solve the global task of inexhaustible power generation. Along with this, the solar energy looks preferable in comparison with coal and gas thermal power in terms of the environmental impact. Despite protective measures, including projects on carbon sequestration and CO2 capture, the problem is solved only partially. In the article, a special section is devoted to energy-efficient industrial technologies for individual consumers and households. The author stresses that the possibilities of the Trump administration to radically change the diversified character of energy are very limited, since there is essentially no federal regulation of this issue in the United States (with the exception of hydro power plants), and the power industry structure is largely formed by the states. Examples of the renewable energy development in countries of Europe, Southeast Asia and Latin America are given.
1. The Paris Agreement. Climate Focus. Summary. Available аt: http://www.climatefocus.com/sites/default/files/20151228%20 COP%2021%20briefing%20FIN.pdf (accessed 05.05.2018).
2. Sheppard K. Obama Calls on Federal Agencies to Reduce Emissions 40 Percent by 2025. The Huffington Post, 19.03.2015. Available аt: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/19/obama-federal-emissions_n_6901970.html (accessed 29.05.2018).
3. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. 67th edition. BP. June 2018. Available аt: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review‑2018-co2-emissions.pdf (accessed 05.05.2018).
4. Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy. Executive Order 13795 of April 28, 2017. Federal Register. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/05/03/2017–09087/implementing-an-america-firstoffshore-energy-strategy (accessed 05.05.2018).
5. Electricity Monthly Update with Data for April 2018. U. S. Energy Information Administration. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/update/ (accessed 05.05.2018).
6. Popovich N., Fountain H. What Is the Green Climate Fund and How Much Does the U. S. Actually Pay? The New York Times, 02.05.2017. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/02/climate/trump-paris-green-climatefund.html (accessed 05.05.2018).
7. Wasserman G. The Politics of Global Warming – The Tragedy of the Climate Bill. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 1, no. 11, Special Issue – August 2011. Available at: http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No_11_Special_Issue_August_2011/9.pdf (accessed 05.05.2018).
8. A New Foundation For American Greatness. Budget of the US Government. Fiscal Year 2018. Table S‑8. Office of Management and Budget. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/budget.pdf (accessed 12.03.2018).
9. White House Seeks 72 Percent Cut to Clean Energy Research, Underscoring Administration’s Preference. Washington Post, 01.05.2018. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/white-house-seeks‑72-percent-cutto-clean-energy-research-underscoring-administrations-preference-for-fossil-fuelsv/2018/01/31/c2c69350–05f3–11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html (accessed 11.03.2018).
10. Sustainable Energy in America Factbook 2018. Washington D. C., February 15, 2018. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Available at: https://about.bnef.com/blog/sustainable-energy-america-factbook‑2018/ (accessed 26.03.2018).
11. Funk C., Kennedy B., Hefferon M., Strauss M. Majorities See Government Efforts to Protect the Environment as Insufficient. Pew Research Center, May 14, 2018. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/14/majorities-see-governmentefforts-to-protect-the-environment-as-insufficient/ (accessed 04.03.2018).
12. Renewables 2017 Global Status Report. Jobs in Renewable Energy. REN21. 2017. Available at: http://www.ren21.net/wpcontent/uploads/2017/06/17–8399_GSR_2017_Full_Report_0621_Opt.pdf (accessed 19.02.2018).
13. Natural Gas Plants Under Attacks in Several States. Institute for Energy Research (IER), March 26, 2018. Available at: http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/analysis/natural-gas-plants-attack-several-states/ (accessed 27.04.2018).
14. US Energy and Employment Report, January 2017. U. S. Department of Energy. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/2017%20US%20Energy%20and%20Jobs%20Report_0.pdf (accessed 19.05.2018).
15. Perkins M. Sh. Report. Oil, Gas and Coal Industries Get a Shocking Amount of Funding from the US Government. Business Insider, 05.05.2017. Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/public-financing-oil-gas-coal‑2017-7 (accessed 20.05.2018).
16. Bast E., Pickard S., Whitley S. The Fossil Fuel Bailout: G20 Subsidies for Oil, Gas and Coal Exploration. Overseas Development Institute. London, November 2014. Available at: http://priceofoil.org/content/uploads/2014/11/G20-Fossil-Fuel-Bailout-Full.pdf (accessed 20.04.2018).
17. Liebreich M. Seventh Clean Energy Ministerial. San Francisco, 2 May 2016. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Available at: http://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/sites/default/files/2018-01/CEM7-BNEFpres.pdf (accessed 10.05.2018).
18. Green Bonds. RBC Capital Markets, 04.04.2017. Available at: https://www.rbccm.com/assets/rbccm/docs/news/2017/green-is-the-new-black.pdf (accessed 07.05.2018).
19. French G. Green Bonds Come of Age. HSBC, 17.08.2017. Available at: http://www.hsbc.com/news-and-insight/insightarchive/2017/green-bonds-come-of-age (accessed 07.05.2018).
20. Ederington J., Minier J. Environmental Regulation and Trade Flows. University of Miami, January 19, 2000. Available at: https://zdoc.site/environmental-regulation-and-trade-flows‑1-introduction.html (accessed 08.05.2018).
21. Trump Imposes Steep Tariffs on Imported Solar Panels and Washing Machines. The Guardian, 23.01.2018. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jan/23/trump-imposes-steep-tariffs-on-imported-solar-panels-andwashing-machines (accessed 07.05.2018).
22. Doan L., Eckhouse B. Why Trump is Taxing Solar Panels Imported by US. Bloomberg, 23.01.2018. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-23/why-trump-is-taxing-solar-panels-imported-by-u-s-quicktake-q-a (accessed 20.05.2018).