Moksha Mordvin resultative and the diachrony of resultative constructions
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
425


Downloads
36
UDC
Издательство
Date of publication
25.01.2016
Public year
2016
Moksha Mordvin resultative and the diachrony of resultative constructions
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?

The article focuses on the syntax and semantics of Moksha Mordvin resultative participle in -f. The participle can either be used in a bona fide resultative construction, agreeing in person and number with the subject, or head an impersonal clause. In the first case, the participle is formed from telic patientive predicates (in a way imposing prototypically resultative semantics on other kinds of predicates), while in the second case it demands that the predicate be atelic and its subject be animate. Besides, the difference between two particles apak and af, both of which can be used to negate the participle, is considered. For the facts observed a diachronical explanation in terms of Construction Grammar is given.

Об авторах
Alexey A. Kozlov
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
References

1. Arutyunova 1988 — Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenij: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. M.: Nauka, 1988. [Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenii: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic meaning. Assessment, event, fact]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988.]

2. Bubrikh 1953 — Bubrikh D. V. Istoricheskaya grammatika ehrzyanskogo yazyka. Saransk: Mordovskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1953. [Bubrikh D. V. Istoricheskaya grammatika erzyanskogo yazyka [A historical grammar of the Erzya language]. Saransk: Mordovskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel’stvo, 1953.]

3. Zaliznyak 1990 — Zaliznyak Anna A. O ponyatii «fakt» v lingvisticheskoj semantike // Arutyunova N. D. (red). Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Protivorechivost' i anomal'nost' teksta. M.: Nauka, 1990. S. 21—33. [Zalizniak Anna A. On the concept of fact in linguistic semantics. Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Protivorechivost’ i anomal’nost’ teksta. Arutyunova N. D. (ed). Moscow: Nauka, 1990. Pp. 21—33.]

4. Knyazev 2007 — Knyazev Yu. P. Grammaticheskaya semantika: Russkij yazyk v tipologicheskoj perspektive. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2007. [Knyazev Yu. P. Grammaticheskaya semantika: Russkii yazyk v tipologicheskoi perspektive [Grammatical semantics. Russian from the typological perspective]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2007.]

5. Kolyadenkov, Zavodova 1962 — Kolyadenkov M. N., Zavodova R. A. (red). Grammatika mordovskikh (mokshanskogo i ehrzyanskogo) yazykov. Saransk: Mordovskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1962. [Kolyadenkov M. N., Zavodova R. A. (eds). Grammatika mordovskikh (mokshanskogo i erzyanskogo) yazykov [A grammar of the Mordvin languages (Moksha and Erzya)]. Saransk: Mordovskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel’stvo, 1962.]

6. Lander 2003 — Lander Yu. A. Perfekt i obstoyatel'stva konkretnogo vremeni // Plungyan V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu. (sost.). Yazyki mira. Tipologiya. Uralistika. Pamyati T. Zhdanovoj. Stat'i i vospominaniya. M.: Indrik, 2003. S. 300—312. [Lander Yu. A. Perfect and adverbial modifiers of specific time. Yazyki mira. Tipologiya. Uralistika. Pamyati T. Zhdanovoi. Stat’i i vospominaniya. Plungian V. A., Urmanchieva A. Yu. (comp.). Moscow: Indrik, 2003. Pp. 300—312.]

7. Nedyalkov, Yakhontov 1983 — Nedyalkov V. P., Yakhontov S. E. Tipologiya rezul'tativnykh konstruktsij // Nedyalkov V. P. (otv. red.). Tipologiya rezul'tativnykh konstruktsij (rezul'tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt). L.: Nauka, 1983. S. 5—41. [Nedyalkov V. P., Yakhontov S. E. Typology of resultative structures. Tipologiya rezul’tativnykh konstruktsii (rezul’tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt). Nedyalkov V. P. (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. Pp. 5—41.]

8. Paducheva 1996 — Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskie issledovaniya (Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrativa). M.: Yazyki russkoj kul'tury, 1996. [Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskie issledovaniya (Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrativa) [Semantic studies. Semantics of tense and aspect in Russian. Semantics of narrative]. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury, 1996.]

9. Paducheva 2004 — Paducheva E. V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2004. [Paducheva E. V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki [Dynamic models in the semantics of lexis]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2004.]

10. Paducheva 2010 — Paducheva E. V. Sobytijnoe i statal'noe znachenie glagolov sovershennogo vida v russkom yazyke // Vydrin V. F. i dr. (red.) Problemy grammatiki i tipologii. Sbornik statej pamyati V. P. Nedyalkova. M.: Znak, 2010. S. 240—252. [Paducheva E. V. Perfective verbs in Russian: The meaning of state and event. Problemy grammatiki i tipologii. Sbornik statei pamyati V. P. Nedyalkova. Vydrin V. F. et al. (eds). Moscow: Znak, 2010. Pp. 240—252.]

11. Serdobol'skaya, Toldova 2012 — Serdobol'skaya N. V., Toldova S. Yu. Differentsirovannoe markirovanie pryamogo dopolneniya v finno-ugorskikh yazykakh // Kuznetsova A. I. (gl. red.). Finno- ugorskie yazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisaniya. Formal'nyj i funktsional'nyj podkhody. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2012. S. 59—141. [Serdobol’skaya N. V., Toldova S. Yu. Differential direct object marking in the Finno-Ugrian languages. Finno-ugorskie yazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisaniya. Formal’nyi i funktsional’nyi podkhody. Kuznetsova A. I. (ed.). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2012. Pp. 59—141.]

12. Stenin 2013 ― Stenin I. A. Mokshanskaya derivatsiya na -v-. Doklad na Pervom vorkshope po mordovskim yazykam (filologicheskij fakul'tet MGU, 14 dekabrya 2013 g.), 2013. [Stenin I. A. Mokshanskaya derivatsiya na -v-. Doklad na Pervom vorkshope po mordovskim yazykam (filologicheskii fakul’tet MGU, 14 dekabrya 2013 g.) [Moksha derivation in -v-. A paper presented at the 1st workshop on the Mordvin languages (Moscow State Univ., Philology Department, December 14, 2013)], 2013.]

13. Tatevosov 2010 — Tatevosov S. G. Aktsional'nost' v leksike i grammatike. Dis. … dokt. filol. nauk. M.: MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova, 2010. [Tatevosov S. G. Aktsional’nost’ v leksike i grammatike. Dokt. diss. [Actionality in lexicon and grammar. Doct. diss.]. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State Univ., 2010.]

14. Testelets 2008 — Testelets Ya. G. Struktura predlozhenij s nevyrazhennoj svyazkoj v russkom yazyke // Bondarko A. V., Kustova G. I., Rozina R. I. (red.) Dinamicheskie modeli. Slovo, predlozhenie, tekst. Sbornik statej v chest' E. V. Paduchevoj. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2008. S. 773—789. [Testelets Ya. G. Sentence structure with a covert copula in Russian. Dinamicheskie modeli. Slovo, predlozhenie, tekst. Sbornik statei v chest’ E. V. Paduchevoi. Bondarko A. V., Kustova G. I., Rozina R. I. (eds). Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2008. Pp. 773—789.]

15. Tsypkajkina 2007 ― Tsypkajkina V. P. Temporal'nost' v mordovskikh yazykakh i printsipy ee opisaniya. Saransk: Izdatel'stvo Mordovskogo universiteta, 2007. [Tsypkaikina V. P. Temporal’nost’ v mordovskikh yazykakh i printsipy ee opisaniya [Temporality in the Mordvin languages and the principles of its description]. Saransk: Mordovia State Univ. Publ., 2007.]

16. Abraham 2011 — Abraham W. Verbs of motion. Impersonal passivization between unaccusativity and unergativity. Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective. Malchukov A., Siewierska A. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. Pp. 91—125.

17. Abraham, Leiss 2006 ― Abraham W., Leiss E. The impersonal passive: Voice suspended under aspectual conditions. Passivization and typology: Form and function. Abraham W., Leisiö L. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. Pp. 502—517.

18. Asher 1993 ― Asher N. Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993.

19. Croft 2012 — Croft W. Verbs, aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.

20. Dahl, Hedin 2000 ― Dahl Ö., Hedin E. Current relevance and event reference. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Empirical approaches to language typology. Dahl Ö. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. Pp. 385—402.

21. Dowty 1991 — Dowty D. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language. Vol. 67. No. 3. Pp. 547—619.

22. Fleischman 1982 — Fleischman S. The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

23. Geniušene 2006 — Geniušene E. Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian). Passivization and typology: form and function. Werner A., Leisiö L. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. Pp. 29—61.

24. Goldberg 1995 — Goldberg A. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1995.

25. Haspelmath 1994 — Haspelmath M. Passive participles across languages. Voice: Form and function. Fox B., Hopper P. J. (eds). (= Typological studies in language. Vol. 27.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1994. Pp. 151—177.

26. Holvoet 2002 — Holvoet A. Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Fennic. The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. Vol. 2: Grammar and typology. Dahl Ö., Koptevskaja-Tamm M. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. Pp. 363—389.

27. Karlsson 1999 ― Karlsson F. Finnish: An essential grammar. London: Routledge, 1999.

28. Kholodilova 2015 — Kholodilova M. Moksha non-verbal predication. Suomalais-Ugrilaise Seuran Aikakauskirja [Mordvin Languages in the Field]. In press.

29. Malchukov, Siewierska 2011 — Malchukov A., Siewierska A. Introduction. Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Malchukov A., Siewierska A. (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. Pp. 1—16.

30. Peterson 1997 — Peterson D. Facts, propositions, events. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.

31. Perlmutter 1978 — Perlmutter D. M. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual meeting of the Berkley linguistic society. Vol. 4. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society, 1978. Pp. 157—189.

32. Plungian, van der Auwera 2006 — Plungian V. A., van der Auwera J. Towards a typology of discontinuous Past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. 2006. Vol. 59. No. 4. Pp. 317—349.

33. Primus 2010 — Primus B. Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives. Lingua. 2011. Vol. 121. No. 1. Pp. 80—99.

34. Seržant 2011 — Seržant I. A. The so-called possessive perfect in North Russian and the Circum-Baltic area. A diachronic and areal approach. Lingua. 2011. Vol. 122. No. 4. Pp. 356—385.

35. Shibatani 1998 — Shibatani M. Voice parameters. Typology of verbal categories. Kulikov L., Vater H. (eds). Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1998. Pp. 117—138.

36. Tommola 2000 — Tommola H. On the perfect in North Slavic. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Empirical approaches to language typology. Dahl Ö. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. Pp. 441—478.

37. Turunen 2006 — Turunen R. Complex morphosyntactic features in nominal predicates in Erzya. SKY Journal of Linguistics. 2006. Vol. 19. Pp. 173—187.

38. Turunen 2010 — Turunen R. Nonverbal predication in Erzya. Studies on morphosyntactic variation and part of speech distinctions. PhD thesis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2010.

39. Wiemer 2004 — Wiemer B. The evolution of passives as grammatical constructions in Northern Slavic and Baltic languages. What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Bisang W., Himmelmann N. P., Wiemer B. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. Pp. 271—331.

40. Zaenen 1993 — Zaenen A. Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. Semantics and the Lexicon. Pustejovsky J. (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993. Pp. 129—161.