THE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM AS A SOURCEFOR NATIONAL PRIDE: A CROSS-NATIONAL ANALYSISOF INDIVIDUAL AND COUNTRY-LEVEL FACTORS
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
371


Downloads
77
UDC
Date of publication
01.10.2016
Public year
2016
ISBN
1727-0634
THE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM AS A SOURCEFOR NATIONAL PRIDE: A CROSS-NATIONAL ANALYSISOF INDIVIDUAL AND COUNTRY-LEVEL FACTORS
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?
This research considers how representations of the social security system can be a source of national pride. It aims to uncover the specific features of pride in the social security system by estimating the effects of various factors based on cross-national evidence from the International Social Survey Program - National Identity and multiple country-level measurements of social policies. The results show that the level of pride in the social security system is higher than pride in other socioeconomic achievements and has higher variance at the aggregated country level. The higher variance is due to the country-specific objective characteristics of the social sphere, especially those directly related to material well-being, and also to the expectations formed by the past: the socialist legacy negatively affects pride in the social security system even more strongly than other facets of pride. The strongest individual-level factors affecting pride in the social security are those directly related to social inequality. Pride is lower among those who are more vulnerable and dependent on social policies (generally women rather than men) and those who bear the costs (full-time employed as main taxpayers). On the other hand, it is higher among those who might appreciate its necessity in ideological terms (the better educated) and need it less (those with higher subjective social status). This outcome shows an important discrepancy in evaluations: those with a greater impact on policymaking have a more optimistic view of the social security system than those whom it primarily affects. These results have important policy implications as they suggest that, by presenting social policy issues in a more positive manner and specifically targeting past-oriented expectations, policymakers can foster public understanding and involvement.
Об авторах
References
1. Cox R. (2004) The Path-dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2): 204-219
2. Dixon J. (2000) A Global Ranking of National Social Security Systems. International Social Security Review, 53 (1): 109-122
3. Esping-Andersen G., Korpi W. (1986) From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States: The Development of Scandinavian Social Policy. International Journal of Sociology, 16 (3/4): 39-74
4. Fabrykant M., Magun V. (2016) Grounded and Normative Dimensions of National Pride in Comparative Perspective. P. Schmidt, J. Grimm, L. Huddy, J. Seethaler (eds.) Dynamics of National Identity: Media and Societal Factors of What We Are, London: Routledge: 109-138
5. Gross N. (2013) Why are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
6. Inglehart R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics, Princeton: Princeton University Press
7. Iarskaia-Smirnova E., Prisyazhnyuk D., Kononenko R. (2016) Representations of Inequality and Social Policy in the Russian Official Press, 2005-2012. Journal of European Social Policy, 26 (3): 268-280
8. ILO (2015) World Social Protection Report 2014-15. Available at: https://clck.ru/A4yXp (accessed 20 March 2016)
9. ISSP Research Group (2015) International Social Survey Programme: National Identity III-$5SSP 2013, Cologne: GESIS Data Archive: ZA5950 Data file Version 2.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.12312
10. Kvist J., Fritzell J., Bjørn H., Kangas O. (2012) Changing Social Equality: The Nordic welfare Model in the 21st century, Bristol: Policy Press
11. NATIXIS (2015) Global Retirement Index. An in-depth assessment of welfare in retirement around the world. Available at: https://clck.ru/A4yZM (accessed 20 March 2016)
12. Romanov P. (2008) Quality Evaluation in Social Services: Challenges for New Public Management in Russia. Mixes, Matches, and Mistakes. New Public Management in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Budapest: Open Society Institute
13. Simon R., Brooks A. (2009) The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship the World Over, Lanham: Lexington Books
14. Smith T. W., Jarkko L. (1998) National Pride: A Cross-national Analysis, Chicago: National Opinion Research Center
15. Smith T. W., Kim S. (2006) National Pride in Comparative Perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18 (1): 127-136
16. Solt F. (2011) Diversionary Nationalism: Economic Inequality and the Formation of National Pride. The Journal of Politics, 73 (3): 821-830
17. World Bank (2016) World Development Indicators. Available at: https://clck.ru/AC39h (accesses 24 March 2016)