Pragmatic Liberalism and Modernization of Upbringing
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Date of publication
Public year
Pragmatic Liberalism and Modernization of Upbringing
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?
Upbringing is regarded as a purposeful training to teach human values. By definition, upbringing engages the deep-lying moral attitudes of people, the moral and cultural values that have always been disputed by the society. Upbringing inevitably involves conflicts; moreover, its social utility is hard to measure. These two factors combined, without active interference of the State, may gradually kill the upbringing practices, which is far not the best possible option for the national policy. First, in this case general education school would stop existing as a social organization. Schools with stronger educational components are more stable. Second, upbringing only forms a part of human capital. Beside cognitive skills, human capital also includes social capital and creative capital, which are the real key players in post-industrial economies. If the upbringing component of the national education system is lost, it may degrade the quality of human capital required at the next stage of national economic development. Third, Russian upbringing practices are based on a significant experience of global importance; a lot of funds have been invested to organizational and financial structure of upbringing throughout many decades. To modernize upbringing, we should tie it closely to economic and social development needs of the country. Governmental or nonprofit grants could be provided to fund a number of projects to be implemented by regional teacher associations. The Creative Leader program, for example, consists in creating reliable instruments to measure creative and cooperation skills, developing reasonable standards to determine what creative and cooperation skills children must have and use at each age, reconciling these standards with those of general education, introducing a competitive program to create specific forms of working designed exclusively for contemporary children, and discarding without mercy everything that worked with previous generations only.
Об авторах
  1. Frumin I. (2011) Intellektualnaya nishcheta vysokikh stremleniy [Intellectual Pov- References erty of High Aspirations]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, no 4, pp. 27-52.
  2. Hanushek E. A., Woessmann L. (2008) The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 46, no 3, pp. 607-668. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2014).
  3. Hunter J. D. (1992) Culture Wars: The Struggle to Control the Family, Art, Education, Law, and Politics in America. New York: Basic Books.
  4. Hurn Ch. J. (1993) The Limits and Possibilities of Schooling. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  5. Lerner I. (1985) Uchebno-vospitatelny protsess kak sistema [Upbringing and Educating Process as a System]. Novye issledovaniya v pedagoguicheskikh naukakh, no 1, pp. 11-16.
  6. Liimets H. (1982) Kak vospityvayetprotsess obucheniya [Upbringing Provided by Education Process]. Moscow: Znaniye.
  7. Manuylov Y. (2002) Sredovoy podkhod v vospitanii [Environment-Based Approach to Upbringing]. Moscow; Nizhny Novgorod.
  8. Novikova L. (1978) Pedagogika detskogo kollektiva (voprosy teorii) [Child Pedagogy: Theoretical Issues]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
  9. Rawls J. (1999) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University.
  10. Sidorkin A. (2006) Fakultet nenuzhnykh veshchey: smysl i osnovnaya problema vospitaniya [Faculty of Needless Things: Implications and the Paramount Problem of Upbringing]. Konteksty i podteksty obrazovaniya: Novye tsen-nosti obrazovaniya, no 5-6 (29-30), pp. 43-48.
  11. Sidorkin A. (2008) Nerynochnaya ekonomika shkoly [Non-Market Economy of School]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye, no 10, pp. 223-231.
  12. Sidorkin A. (2012) Sotsialnoye vospitaniye v gonke obrazovaniy [Social Upbringing in the Race of Education]. Proceedings of the Strategies and Resources of Social Upbringing: Challenges of the 21st Century. International Scientific and Practical Conference within the 6th Siberian Pedagogical Seminar (Novosibirsk, November 6-8, 2012). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, vol. 1, pp. 133-141.
  13. Taylor Ch. (1992) Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
  14. Vessels G., Huitt W. (2005) Moral and Character Development. Paper presented at the National Youth at Risk Conference, Savannah, GA, 8-10 March, 2005. Available at: (accessed 20 May 2014).
  15. Willaime J.-P. (2006) Different Models for Religion and Education in Europe. Religion in Education. A Contribution to Dialogue or a Factor of Conflict in Transforming Societies of European Countries. Hamburg: REDCo Available at: (accessed 20 May 2014).