Leo Tolstoy and Max Weber on value neutrality of university research
Reviews
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Views
269


Downloads
54
UDC
Date of publication
01.09.2010
Public year
2010
ISBN
1814-9545
Leo Tolstoy and Max Weber on value neutrality of university research
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?
The problem of value neutrality of science is considered on the basis of works by Leo Tolstoy and Max Weber. In the first part of the article, the statements on the value neutrality of scientific knowledge and university teaching by Weber and Tolstoy are made explicit and analyzed in a comparative perspective. In the second part, the central problem of Tolstoy and Weber, that is, a rational choice of the value paradigm, is studied systematically. Differences in their assumptions and conclusions are shown. In the third part, a historical commentary to the context of Tolstoy’s and Weber’s works is given. The works are treated as episodes in a wider modern history of the value neutralization of the scientific knowledge and university teaching. The specifics of this process are tightly connected with the fundamental principles of the modern research university (the Humboldtian model of university).
Об авторах
References
1. Andreev A. Yu. Rossijskie universitety XVIII — pervoj poloviny XIX veka v kontekste universitetskoj istorii Evropy. M.: Znak, 2009.
2. Bibikhin V. V. Vil'gel'm Dil'tej i Lev Tolstoj // Germenevtika. Psikhologiya, istoriya. Vil'gel'm Dil'tej i sovremennaya filosofiya. Materialy nauch. konf. RGGU; pod red. N. Plotnikova. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2002.
3. Veber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya / Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990.
4. Veber M. O Rossii: Izbrannoe. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2007.
5. Venttsel' K. N. Ehtika i pedagogika tvorcheskoj lichnosti (Problemy nravstvennosti i vospitaniya v svete teorii svobodnogo garmonicheskogo razvitiya zhizni i soznaniya). T. 2. Pedagogika tvorcheskoj lichnosti. M.: Knigoizdatel'stvo K. I. Tikhomirova, 1912.
6. Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovaniya // Filosofskie raboty. Chast' I. M.: Gnozis, 1994. S. 75-320.
7. Gegel' G. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kn. 1. SPb.: Nauka, 1993.
8. Gumbol'dt V. O vnutrennej i vneshnej organizatsii vysshikh nauchnykh zavedenij v Berline // Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2002. № 2.
9. Davydov Yu. Maks Veber i Lev Tolstoj: (K probleme sootnosheniya ehtiki ubezhdeniya i ehtiki otvetstvennosti) // Voprosy literatury. 1994. № 1. S. 77-105.
10. Kant I. Ideya vseobschej istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane // Kant I. Soch. v 4-kh t. T. 1. M.: Kami, 1993.
11. Kurennoj V. Sintez i individual'nost': Svobodnaya pedagogika Konstantina Nikolaevicha Venttselya v kontekste ego filosofskoj sistemy // Gumanitarnyj kontekst. 2009. № 2. S. 276-287.
12. Kurennoj V. Filosofiya i instituty: sluchaj fenomenologii // Logos. 2002. № 5/6 (35). S. 135-161.
13. Kurennoj V. Filosofskij proekt «Logosa»: nemetskij i russkij kontekst // Logos» v istorii evropejskoj filosofii: Proekt i pamyatnik: sb. materialov. M.: Territoriya buduschego, 2006.
14. Logicheskie issledovaniya Adol'fa Trendelenburga. Ch. 1-2. Per. E. Korsha. M.: Tipografiya Gracheva i Ko, izdanie K. Soldatenkova, 1868.
15. Marks K., Ehngel's F. Sochineniya. 2-e izd. T. 1. M.: Politizdat, 1955-1981
16. Natorp P. Sbornik statej po filosofii, logike, teorii kul'tury. M.: Territoriya buduschego, 2006.
17. Rikkert G. O sisteme tsennostej // Logos. 1914 (Reprint 2005). T. 1. Vyp. 1. S. 45-79.
18. Tolstoj L. Vospitanie i obrazovanie // Tolstoj L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 90 t. Yubilejnoe izdanie (1828-1928). / pod obsch. red. V. G. Chertkova. Ser. 1: Proizvedeniya. T. 8. Pedagogicheskie stat'i, 1860-1863. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1936.
19. Tolstoj L. O svobodnoj shkole (Iz pis'ma P. I. B-vu) // Tolstoj L. Vospitanie v svobode: Izbrannye pedagogicheskie stat'i. M., 2005.
20. Tolstoj L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 90 t. Yubilejnoe izdanie (1828-1928) / pod obsch. red. V. G. Chertkova. Ser. 1: Proizvedeniya. T. 8. Pedagogicheskie stat'i, 1860-1863. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1936.
21. Tyurel' Kh. Intellektual'naya religioznost', semantika «smysla», ehtika bratstva — Maks Veber i ego otnoshenie k Tolstomu i Dostoevskomu // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 1999. № 2 (4).
22. Bayertz K., Gerhard M., Jaeschke W. (Hg.) Weltanschauung, Philosophie und Naturwissenschaft im 19. Jahrhundert. Band 1: Der Materialismus-Streit. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007.
23. Johnson P. (1999) The birth of the modern. World society 1815-1830. Harper Collins Publishers. P. 545.
24. Kohnke K. C. (1986) Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus: Die deutsche Universitatsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986. S. 121.
25. LQbbe H. (1974) Politische Philosophie in Deutschland. Studien zu ihrer Geschichte. MQnchen. S. 124-170
26. McCumber J. (2001) Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy in MacCarthy era. Ill., NWU Press
27. Reich G. A. (2005) How the cold war transformed philosophy of science to the icy slopes of logic. NY: Camb. UP
28. Schnadelbach H. (1991) Philosophie in Deutschland 1831-1933. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp
29. Trendelenburg A. (1843) Die logische Frage in Hegel's System. Leipzig, Brockhaus.
30. Weltanschauung, Philosophie und Naturwissenschaft im 19. Jahrhundert. (2007) Bd. 1: Der Materialismus-Streit. Hg. von K. Bazertz, M. Gerhard und W. Jaeschke. Hamburg: Felix Meiner