Shang period elites and the hou title in the light of the inscriptions of the thirteenth–eleventh centuries bce: an onomastic research
Shang period elites and the hou title in the light of the inscriptions of the thirteenth–eleventh centuries bce: an onomastic research
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?
The hou-lords’ status and their authority during the late Shang period China in the thirteenth–eleventh centuries BCE remain the point of discussion. Three main hypotheses are put forward. The hou-lords could be either autochthonous leaders of semi-independent polities in the periphery of the Shang state, or ‘feudal’ lords in possession of land granted by the king, or appointed ‘officials’ with limited authority and with more or less determined functions. These hypotheses are now rather problematic due to the data on the names of hou and of their domains. First, the hou names and their domains names both may possess attributes of ethnonyms but these facts show no general tendency. The phenomenon is better explained with peculiar features of ancient Chinese language and writing, such as excessive amount of homonyms, inability to distinguish common words from proper names and to distinguish different types of proper names (place names, personal names, ethnonyms etc.) Cases are too many when we cannot tell whether given proper name is a place name or a personal name, a name of some kinship group or something else. Thus hypothetical connection between hou and kinship groups or primitive polities has no solid ground. Second, Shang period inscriptions refer to hou in style and manner proper for independent or semi-autonomous rulers and not for officials on the king’s service: the way place name is attached to the title argues for the fact that hou actually possessed the land and not just performed certain degree of control over it. Despite other versions cannot be disproved for good, the ‘feudal’ hypothesis should be taken as the main one.
Об авторах
Timur Safin
Postgraduate Student, Faculty of History, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Oriental Studies and Comparative Linguistics, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Cai Zhemao. Yin buci “yong hou tun” bian [Commens on the “to Use Hou Tun” Phrase in the Yin Oracle Inscriptions]. Jiaguwen yu Yin-Shang shi [Oracle Bone Inscriptions and Yin-Shang History]. No. 2. Ed. Song Zhenhao. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2011. Pp. 110–130 (in Chinese).

Chao Lin. The Socio-Political Systems of the Shang Dynasty. Taipei: Institute of the Three Principles of the People, 1982.

Chen Jian. Shi “cong” ji xiangguan zhu zi [Desciphering “Cong” and All the Related Characters]. Chen Jian. Jiagu jinwen kaoshi lunji [Compilation of Oracle Bone and Bronze Inscriptions Studies]. Beijing: Xianzhuang shuju, 2007. Pp. 273–316 (in Chinese).

Chen Mengjia. Yinxu buci zongshu [Yinxu Oracle Inscriptions Summary]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1988 (in Chinese).

Dong Zuobin. Jiaguwen duandai yanjiu li [Examples of Oracle Bone Inscriptions’ Periodization Research]. In: Dong Zuobin. Dong Zuobin xiansheng quanji (jia bian) [Full Compilation of Works by Mr. Dong Zuobin (the first part)]. Taibei: Yiwen yinshuguan, 1977. Pp. 363–464 (in Chinese).

Guo, M. (ed.), Jiaguwen heji [Oracle Bone Inscriptions Compendium]. Beijing, 1978–1982 (in Chinese).

He Jingcheng. Shang-Zhou qingtongqi zushi mingwen yanjiu [Research on Clan Inscriptions of Shang and Zhou Bronzes]. Jinan: Qi-Lu shu she, 2009 (in Chinese).

Hu Houxuan (ed.) Jiaguwen heji shiwen [Transcriptions for the Oracle Bone Inscriptions Compendium]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1999 (in Chinese).

Hu Houxuan. Yindai fengjian zhidu kao [Yin Period Feudal System Research]. Jiaguxue Shang shi luncong chuji [First Compilation of Writings on Oracle Bone Studies and Shang History]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei jiaoyu chubanshe, 2002. Pp. 31–112 (in Chinese).

Huang Tianshu. Tan jiagu zhulushu de fazhan [Talking about the Evolution of Oracle Bone Publications]. Guangming ribao [Guangming Daily], 17.12.2017. P. 12 (in Chinese).

Huang Tianshu. Yinxu jiaguwen xingshengzi suo zhan bizhong de zai tongji [Once Again Counting the Proportion of Phonograms among the Yinxu Oracle Bones]. In: Huang Tianshu. Jiagu jinwen lunji [Compilation of Works on Oracle Bone and Bronze Inscriptions]. Beijing: Xueyuan chubanshe, 2014. Pp. 54–131 (in Chinese).

Huang Tianshu. Yinxu wang buci de fenlei yu duandai [Classification and Periodisation of the Yinxu Royal Oracle Bones]. Beijing: Kexue chubanshe, 2007 (in Chinese).

Keightley D.N. The Shang State as Seen in the Oracle-Bone. Inscriptions. Early China. No. 5. 1979–1980. Pp. 25–34.

Keightley D.N. The Late Shang State: When, Where, and What? In: The Origins of Chinese Civilization. Ed. D.N. Keightley. Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press, 1983. Pp. 523–564.

Keightley D.N. The Ancestral Landscape: Time, Space, and Community in Late Shang China (ca. 1200–1045 B.C.). Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press, 2000.

Keightley D.N. The Shang State as Seen in the Oracle-Bone Inscriptions. Dementievskaia O.S., Zykova V.V. i Kuz’mina E.A. (tr.). History of China. Meterials of Synological Conferences held at IAAS MSU (Collection of articles). Moscow: Gumanitarii, 2007 (in Russian).

Kriukov M.V. Clan and State in the Yin China. Vestnik drevnei istorii (Journal of Ancient History). 1961. No. 2. Pp. 3–22. (In Russian).

Kriukov M.V. The People of Ancient China’s Forms of Social Organisation. Moscow: Nauka, 1967 (in Russian).

Kriukov V.M. The Text and the Rite: Experience of Interpretation of the Yin-Zhou Period Excavated Texts. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2000 (in Russian).

Kuznetsova-Fetisova M.E. The Great City of Shang (XIV–XI cent. B.C.) and it’s Significance in the Ancient Chinese History. Moscow: Nauka–Vostochnaia literatura, 2015 (in Russian).

Lexicon of Pre-Qin Oracle, Bronze Inscriptions and Bamboo Scripts. [Database]. – URL: (availible at: 05.08.2018).

Li Xi. Yinxu buci yufa [Yinxu Oracle Bones’ Grammar]. Xian: Shaanxi shifan daxue chubanshe, 2003 (in Chinese).

Li Xueqin. Xi Jia pan yu Ju fu xu [The Xi Jia Pan-vessel and the Ju Fu Xu-vessel]. In: Li Xueqin. Xin chu qingtongqi yanjiu [Newly Discovered Bronzes Research]. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1990. Pp. 138–145 (in Chinese).

Lin Yun. Jiaguwen zhong de shangdai fangguo lianmeng [Local States’ Alliances in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions]. Lin Yun. Lin Yun xueshu wenji [Scholastic Collections of Lin Yun]. Beijing: Zhongguo dabaike quanshu chubanshe, 1998. Pp. 69–84 (in Chinese).

Ma Baochun, Song Jiucheng. Zhongguo zui zao de lishi kongjian wutai: jiaguwen diming tixi gaishu [Arena of the Earliest Chinese History: Summary of the Place-names System in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions]. Beijing: Xueyuan chubanshe, 2013 (in Chinese).

Mencius. Kolokov V.S. (tr.), Men’shikov L.N. (ed.). Saint-Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 1999 (in Russian).

Qiu Xigui. Jiagu buci zhong suojian de “tian”, “mu”, “wei” deng zhuguan de yanjiu; jianlun “hou”, “dian”, “nan”, “wei” deng ji zhong zhuhou de qiyuan [Research on «Tian», «Mu», «Wei» etc. Officials in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions and Comments on Origins of the «Hou», «Dian», «Nan», «Wei» etc. Feudal Titles]. In: Qiu Xigui. Qiu Xigui xueshu wenji [Qiu Xigui Studies Collection]. Vol. 5. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe, 2012. Pp. 153–168 (in Chinese).

Sang Jinmu (Safin T.) Jiagu zhuihe di yi ze [The First Set of Rejoined Oracle Bones], 2007. URL: (availiable at: 05.08.18) (in Chinese).

Schuessler A. ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Havai'i Press, 2007.

Sima Qian. Records of the Grand Historian (Shi Ji). Vol. 1. Vyatkin R.V. (tr.) Moscow: 2001 (in Russian).

Starostin S.A. Big China. 1991. [Database] – URL: (availible at 05.08.2018) (in Russian).

Starostin S.A. Reconstruction of the Old Chinese Phonological System. Moscow: Nauka, 1989 (in Russian).

Sun Yabing, Lin Huan. Shangdai shi (di shi juan). Shangdai dili yu fangguo [Shang History. Vol. 10. Shang Period Geography and Local Polities]. Ed. Song Zhenhao. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 2010.(in Chinese).

Vasil’ev L.S. Problems of the Ancient Chinese State Genesis. Moscow: Nauka, 1983 (in Russian).

Wang Changfeng. Shang-Zhou jinwen zuhui yanjiu [Research on the Clan Emblems of the Shang and Zhou Bronze Inscriptions]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2015 (in Chinese).

Wang Yuxin, Yang Shengnan. Jiaguxue yibai nian [Centenary of Oracle Bone Studies]. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 1998 (in Chinese).

Watsson J.L. Chinese Kinship Reconsidered: Anthropological Perspectives on Historical Research. The China Quarterly, No. 92 (Dec., 1982). Pp. 589–622.

Wei Xinying. Yindai Shang wangguo zhengzhi dili jiegou yanjiu [A Study on the Geo-political Structure of Shang Kingdom in Yin Dynasty]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2013 (in Chinese).

Wu Zhenfeng. Jinwen renming huibian [Bronze Inscriptions Antroponyms Compilation]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2006 (in Chinese).

Xiao Nan. Anyang Yinxu faxian “yi gua” bujia [Oracle Bone with Book of Changes’ Hexagram Found in Yinxu, Anyang]. Kaogu [Archaeology]. 1989. No. 1. Pp. 66–70 (in Chinese).

Xia-Shang-Zhou duandai gongcheng zhuanjia zu [Xia-Shang-Zhou chronology progect experts] (eds.) Xia-Shang-Zhou duandai gongcheng 1996–2000 nian jieduan chengguo baogao: jianben [Xia-Shang-Zhou Chronology Progect Report of Achievements for the Years 1996–2000]. Beijing: Shijie tushu chuban gongsi, 2000 (in Chinese).

Yang Shengnan. Jiaguwen zhong de “nan” zi wei juecheng shuo [Hypothesis that the Term “Man” in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions is a Title ]. Zhongguo wenwu [Chinese Cultural Relics], 1999. No. 2. Pp. 4–8 (in Chinese).

Yao Xiaosui (ed.) Yinxu jiagu keci leizuan [Yinxu Oracle Bone Inscriptions Sorted by Character]. Beijing: Zhognhua shuju, 1989 (in Chinese).

Yao Xiaosui (ed.) Yinxu jiagu keci moshi zongji [Full Compilation of Yinxu Oracle Bone Inscriptions’ Drawings]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1998 (in Chinese)

Zhao, P., 2007: Yinxu jiaguwen renming yu duandai de chubu yanjiu [Personal Names in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions and Periodization: Preliminary Research]. Beijing: Xianzhuang shuju, 2007 (in Chinese).

Zhong Bosheng, Chen Zhaohua, Huang Mingchong, Yuan Guohua (eds.) Xin shou Yin-Zhou qingtongqi mingwen ji qiying huibian [Compendium of Texts and Images of Newly Acquired Shang and Zhou Bronze Vessels] Taipei: Yiwen yinshuguan, 2006 (in Chinese).

Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo [Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences] (eds.), Xiaotun nandi jiagu [Oracle Bones from Xiaotun South]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1983 (in Chinese).

Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo [Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences] (eds.), Yin Zhou jinwen ji cheng [Compendium of the Yin-Zhou Bronze Inscriptions]. Beijing, 1984 (in Chinese).

Zhu Fenghan. Shang-Zhou jiazu xingtai yanjiu [Research on Family Patterns of Shang and Zhou]. Tianjin: Tianjin guji chubanshe, 2004 (in Chinese).

Zhu Fenghan. Yinxu buci zhong “hou” de shenfen buzheng; jianlun “hou”, “bo” zhi yitong [Additional Evidence on Rethinking “Hou” Title in the Oracle Bone Inscriptions and Comments on the Similarities and Differences of “Hou” and “Bo”]. Li Zongkun (ed.) Gu wenzi yu gudai shi [Ancient Writing and Ancient History]. No. 4. Taibei: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo, 2015. Pp. 1–36 (in Chinese).