The idea of Apostolic succession in the Epistle of St. Firmilian of Caesarea to SVMC. To Cyprian Of Carthage
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)


Educational program
Date of publication
Public year
The idea of Apostolic succession in the Epistle of St. Firmilian of Caesarea to SVMC. To Cyprian Of Carthage
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?
The article is devoted to the analysis of the teaching of SVT. Firmilian of Caesarea about the Apostolic succession contained in his Epistle to SVMC. Cyprian of Carthage (256). The creation of this text was caused by disagreements on the need to baptize heretics who converted to the Catholic faith. If SVT. Firmilian and SVMC. Cyprian considered heretical baptisms invalid, then Bishop Stephen of Rome, citing local Roman tradition supposedly Dating back to the apostles, as well as his authority as the successor of AP. Peter, insisted on a General rejection of the practice of re-baptizing heretics. As part of the dispute, questions were raised regarding the status of the AP. Peter as the Foundation of Church unity, the succession of Apostolic witness in local churches and the hierarchy of authority between Them, as well as the transmission of the power to absolve sins from the apostles to the bishops. As the author tried to show, SVT. Firmilian largely takes a universalist ecclesiology SVMC. Cyprian, however, supplemented his argument with theses based on an earlier local-historical interpretation of the Apostolic succession, characteristic of Egesippus, St. Irenaeus of Lyons, and Tertullian. In particular, he contrasts the Roman tradition with the authority of the Church of Jerusalem and claims the Apostolic origin of the customs of the Church of Caesarea. A prominent place in the message of SVT. Firmilian is also interested in the controversy against the Montanists. Special emphasis is placed on the transfer of Episcopal authority through ordination in the theology of the Holy see. Firmiliana anticipates the formation of a system of ecclesiastical provinces in the East, within which the control of Episcopal offices is concentrated in the hands of the Metropolitan. Under this system of Church organization, Apostolic succession begins to be seen not as something belonging to the local Church, but as a gift given to it from outside by the Episcopal College. The ecclesiological problem of disputes about the baptism of heretics seems relevant in the light of the current crisis in relations between local Orthodox churches.
Об авторах

Afanas'ev N., protopr. Tserkov', predsedatel'stvuyuschaya v Lyubvi // Afanas'ev N., protopr. Tserkov' Bozhiya vo Khriste: Sbornik statej. M., 2015. S. 542–600.
Mattei P. Afrikanskie sobory v ehpokhu sv. Kipriana Karfagenskogo // Sobor i sobornost': K stoletiyu nachala novoj ehpokhi. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii 13–16 noyabrya 2017 g. M., 2018. S. 7–27.
Baumkamp E. Kommunikation in der Kirche des 3. Jahrhunderts. Bischöfe und Gemeinden zwischen Konfl ikt und Konsens im Imperium Romanum. Tübingen, 2014.
Carpin A. Battezzati nell’unica vera Chiesa? Cipriano di Cartagine e la controversia battesimale. Bologna, 2007.
Caspar E. Geschichte des Papsttums von den Anfängen bis zur Höhe der Weltherrschaft. Bd. I. Tübingen, 1930.
Dunn G. D. Cyprian and the Bishops of Rome: Questions of Papal Primacy in the Early Church. Sydney, 2007.
Ehrhardt A. The Apostolic Succession in the First Two Centuries of the Church. L., 1953.
Emmenegger G. Zur Bedeutung Petri in der Kontroverse um die Ketzertaufe zwischen Cyprian von Karthago und Stephanus von Rom // Heiligkeit und Apostolizitä t der Kirche. Innsbruck, 2010. S. 181–195.
Girardi M. Scrittura e battesimo degli eretici nella lettera di Firmiliano a Cipriano // Vetera Christianorum. 1982. Vol. 19. P. 37–67.
Hall S. G. Stephen I of Rome and the One Baptism // Studia Patristica. Vol. XVII. Pt. 2. Oxford, 1982. P. 796–798.
Métivier S. La Cappadoce (IVe–VIe siècle). Une histoire provinciale de l’Empire romain d’Orient. P., 2005.
Molland E. Le développement de l’idée de succession apostolique // Molland E. Opuscula Patristica. Oslo; Bergen; Tromsø, 1970. P. 181–206.
Rankin D. Tertullian and the Church. Cambridge, 1995.
Salaverri J. La sucesión apostólica en la Historia eclesiástica de Eusebio Cesariense // Gregorianum. 1933. Vol. 14. № 2. P. 219–247.
Saumagne Ch. Saint Cyprien, évêque de Carthage, «Pape» d’Afrique (248–258). Contribution à l’étude des «persécutions» de Dèce et de Valérien. P., 1975.
Sedley D. Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy // Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. New Series. 1977. № 23 (203). P. 74–120.
Simonetti M. Origene dalla Cappadocia ai Cappadoci // Origene e l’alessandrinismo cappadoce (III–IV secolo): Atti del V Convegno del Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca su “Origene e la Tradizione Alessandrina” (Bari, 20–22 settembre 2000) / M. Girardi, ed. Bari, 2002. P. 13–28.
Trigg J. W. The Charismatic Intellectual: Origen’s Understanding of Religious Leadership // Church History. 1981. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 5–19.
Turner S. H. Apostolic Succession // Essays on the Early History of the Church and the Ministry / H. B. Swete, ed. L., 1921. P. 93–214.
Wojtowytsch M. Papsttum und Konzile von den Anfängen bis zu Leo (440–461). Stuttgart, 1981.