Trade Policy of the Trump Administration
Trade Policy of the Trump Administration
Читать книгу Download pdf
О чем книга?
The article examines first foreign trade measures implemented by the Trump administration, the reasons why they were taken and further possible outcomes for the U.S. economy and the world trade development. New features in U.S. interactions with its trade partners including FTA partners as well as the U.S. stance in the relations with the international institutions are analyzed; conclusions are made about the influence of the chosen policy on the U.S. position in the world trade in the long run.
Об авторах
Natalia Minakova
Research Fellow Center for the Applied Economic Research
Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences

1. Bradford S., Grieco P., Hufbauer G. The Payoff to America from Global Integration // The United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade. Ed. by Bergsten F. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2005. P. 65-109.

2. Soglasno dannym Natsional'nogo byuro ehkonomicheskikh issledovanij, v period 1989–2009 gg. pokazateli orientirovannykh na ehksport proizvodstv v SShA byli vyshe sredneotraslevogo pokazatelya bolee chem na 10% po urovnyu zarabotnoj platy i na 30% vyshe po urovnyu proizvoditel'nosti.

3. Economic Impact of Trade Agreements under Trade Authorities Procedures, USITC, 2016. P. 122, 129, 138, 143.

4. Huntington S. The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991, 366 p.

5. 2018 Economic Report of the President. P. 221; 2017 National Security Strategy of the United States. P. 20.

6. McArthur J., Rasmussen K. Who Funds Which Multilaterals? Global Views paper No. 8, The Brookings Institution, December 2017.

7. 2018 WTO Annual Report. P. 200-201. The World Bank IBRD-IDA. Allocation of Votes by Organization. Available at: (accessed: 20.09.2018); International Monetary Fund, IMF Members' Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors. Available at: (accessed 20.09.2018).

8. 2018 Trade Policy Agenda and 2017 Annual Report, USTR, March 2018. P. 25.

9. Stokes B. Republicans, Especially Trump Supporters, See Free Trade Deals as Bad for U.S. Pew Research Center, Fact Tank, News in the Numbers, March 31, 2016. Available at: (accessed: 20.12.2017).

10. Po otsenkam Komissii po mezhdunarodnoj torgovle SShA, cherez 15 let posle vstupleniya v silu dogovora prirost real'nogo dokhoda sostavil by 0,23%, VVP – 0,15%, zanyatosti – 0,07%, ehksporta – 1,0%, importa – 1,1%, naibol'shij prirost mog nablyudat'sya v sel'skom khozyajstve i pischevoj promyshlennosti – 0,5% i v sfere uslug – 0,1%, togda kak v promyshlennom proizvodstve, dobyche prirodnykh resursov i ehnergetike vypusk snizilsya by na 0,1%. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 2016. P. 21.

11. U.S.-EU Joint Report on TTIP Progress, USTR, January 17, 2017.

12. USITC The Year in Trade 2017, August 2018. P. 127-128.

13. Ibid. P. 26.

14. Ibid. P. 24.

15. Setser B. The Right and the Wrong Ways to Adjust the U.S. – China Trade Balance. Council on Foreign Relations, 25.06.2018. Available at: (accessed: 20.09.2018).

16. Acemoglu D., Autor D., Dorn D., Hanson G., Price B. Import Competition and the Great U.S. Employment Saga of the 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 34, No. S1 (Part 2, January 2016). P. S141-S198. Available at: (accessed 01.11.2018).

17. Pauley L. China Takes the Lead in UN Peacekeeping. The Diplomat, 17.04.2018. Available at: (accessed: 01.06.2018).

18. Muro M., Whiton J., Maxim R. How China’s Proposed Tariffs Could Affect U.S. Workers and Industries. The Brookings Institution, April 9, 2018.

19. World Trade Report 2017: Trade, Technology and Jobs. R. 155.