Spatial-time dynamics of geopolitical systems core-peripheral structures
Spatial-time dynamics of geopolitical systems core-peripheral structures
Читать книгу   Download pdf
О чем книга?

At the moment, it is possible to single out a rather extensive problem area related to the application of the historical approach in geopolitical research. Using an example of the core-peripheral analysis of the French Kingdom (during the Centenary war) and the Russian state, the article reveals the potential for the synthesis of historical geography and geopolitics. To do this, as part of the work, it was necessary to develop a methodology for detecting the core-peripheral structures of geopolitical systems, which was done. Thus, the article presents an attempt to differentiate the internal geopolitical space. The results obtained in the course of such an analysis in the form of new conclusions about the geopolitical phenomena in the past are not only of practical value for the study of research objects, but also of great theoretical significance, since they allow creating models for the development of the geopolitical systems core-peripheral structures in the space-time continuum.

Об авторах
Robert Gres
Master Student
Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University
References

1. Artyomov E. T. (2012), Ural in Russian History: Dialectics of “Center-Peripheral” Relations, Tomsk State University Journal. The science. Society. Man, no. 2, pp. 124–129. (In Russ.).

2. Balatsky E. V. (2009), Anatomy of the financial crisis — 2008, Mir izmerenij, no. 1, pp. 34–43. (In Russ.).

3. Wallerstein I. (2018), Mirosystem analysis: Introduction, Moscow, 304 p. (In Russ.).

4. Gibadullin M. Z. (2010), Interregional trade and economic relations of the Kazan Volga region (second half of the 19th century), Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava, no. 2 (14), pp. 5–16. (In Russ.).

5. Gres R. A. (2018), Core-peripheral analysis of the geopolitical system of the Moscow kingdom (XVI–XVII centuries), Humanitarian readings at the Polytechnic University, pp. 29–38. (In Russ.).

6. Gritsay O. V., Ioffe G. V., Treyvish A. I. (1991), Core and periphery in regional development, Moscow, 168 p. (In Russ.).

7. Elatskov A. B. (2017), General geopolitics: questions of theory and methodology in a geographical interpretation, Moscow, INFRA-M, 251 p. (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/21203.

8. Zubarevich N. V. (2017), The development of the Russian space: barriers and opportunities of regional policy, World of the New Economy, no. 2, pp. 46–57. (In Russ.).

9. Ionov I. N. (2010), Postcolonial criticism and the transformation of the ideas of civilization, Dialog so vremenem, no. 30, pp. 257–274. (In Russ.).

10. Isaev B. A. (2016), Geopolitics, St. Petersburg. 496 p. (In Russ.).

11. Istamgalin R. S. (2011), Role of centre, provinces and traditions in historical evolution of the social ideal of Russian agrarian society (IX–XVII), Socium i vlast', no. 3, pp. 9–13. (In Russ.).

12. Kaledin N. V. (2010), The principles of theorization and the categories of political geography, Geographical education and science in Russia: history and current status, pp. 117–138. (In Russ.).

13. Kaledin N. V. (2015), Global geopolitical system: trends in the spatio-temporal core-peripheral stratification, Multiscale core-periphery systems in the context of globalization and regionalization: theory and practice of socio-geographical research, Simferopol, pp. 202–209. (In Russ.).

14. Karachurina L. B., Mkrtchyan N. V. (2013), Change in the population of administrative regions and cities of Russia (1989–2010): core-peripheral relations, Voprosy geografii, Publishing House “Codex”, pp. 82–107. (In Russ.).

15. Kornev I. N., Googe E. R. (2012), Genesis and development of the north-eastern periphery of the Sverdlovsk region: a historical-geographical discourse, Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social'no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya, no. 7, pp. 30–35. (In Russ.).

16. Losch A. (1959), Geography of the location of the economy, Moscow. 455 p. (In Russ.).

17. Lipset M., Roccan S. (2004), Disengagement Structures, Party Systems and Voter Preferences. Preliminary observations, Politicheskaya nauka, no. 4, pp. 204–234. (In Russ.).

18. Okunev I. Yu. (2019), Political geography, Moscow, Publishing house “Aspect Press”, 512 p. (In Russ.).

19. Oppenheim L. (1980), Ancient Mesopotamia (Portrait of a deceased civilization), Moscow, 407 p. (In Russ.).

20. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky V. P. (1915), On powerful territorial ownership in relation to Russia. Essay on political geography, Petrograd. (In Russ.).

21. Speransky A. V. (2013), Ural in the modernization dynamics of Russia of the XX century: research prospects, Ural'skij istoricheskij vestnik, no. 4, pp. 78–87. (In Russ.).

22. Haushofer K. (2016), On geopolitics: works of different years, Moscow, 460 p. (In Russ.).

23. Khoros V. G. (2014), Center-Periphery Relations for the Half Century: Basic Trends of Changes, World economy and international relations, no 2, pp. 53–66. (In Russ.).

24. Shvedov V. G. (2007), The historical political and geographical structure of the territory and its functional elements, Regional'nye issledovaniya, no. 4 (14), pp. 3–12. (In Russ.).

25. Chevenement J.-P. (2015), 1914–2014. Is Europe getting out of history?, Moscow, AST Publishing House. 352 p. (In Russ.).

26. Barnett T. (2004), The Pentagon's new map: War and peace in the twenty-first century, Berkley. 435 p.

27. Berend T. I. et al. (1982), The European periphery and industrialization 1780–1914, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 180 p.

28. Bintliff J. (1997), Regional survey, demography, and the rise of complex societies in the ancient Aegean: Core-periphery, Neo-Malthusian, and other interpretive models, Journal of field archaeology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/530558.

29. Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. (2000), Models of core/periphery structures, Social networks, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 375–395. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733 (99)00019-2.

30. Braudel F. (1960), Histoire et sciences sociales. La longue durée, Revista Internacional de Sociología, vol. 18, no. 70.

31. Breiger R. (1981), Structures of economic interdependence among nations, Continuities in Structural Inquiry, eds. Blau P. M., Merton R. K. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 353–380.

32. Fair T. J. D. (1965), The core-periphery concept and population growth in South Africa, 1911–1960, South African Geographical Journal, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 59–71.

33. Krugman P., Venables A. J. (1995), Globalization and the Inequality of Nations, The quarterly journal of economics, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 857–880. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2946642.

34. Laumann E. O., Pappi F. U. (1976), Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems, New York, Academic Press, 348 p.

35. Pattison P. (1993), Algebraic Models for Social Networks, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 336 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571220.

36. Qi Y. et al. (2004), Evolving core-periphery interactions in a rapidly expanding urban landscape: The case of Beijing, Landscape Ecology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 375–388. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030415.33172.f5.

37. Schortman E. M., Urban P. A. (1994), Living on the edge: Core/periphery relations in ancient southeastern Mesoamerica, Current Anthropology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 401–430. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/204293.

38. Skinner G. W., Henderson M. and Yuan J. H. (2000), China’s fertility transition through regional space, Social Science History, no. 24 (3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200010312.

39. Taylor P. J. (1991), A theory and practice of regions: the case of Europes, Environment and Planning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 183–195. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d090183.